Home   |  Submit Your Site   |  Contact

  Sponsors

 

  Most Recent

 

Creditors Do Not Have An Automatic Right To Accelerate Debts

Article Rated 3.0 out of 5

Michael Goldstein, Esq. Unverified Account
Goldstein and Clegg LLC

Pursuant to the U.S. Bankruptcy code, subsequent to a debtor filing a  chapter 7 or 13 bankruptcy, they are unable to obtain another discharge of  unsecured debt for 8 years.  As such, many debtors believe they have no  way out of new debt incurred.  This  could not be further from the truth.   There is substantial statutory and case law that suggests a right to  negotiate in good faith with creditors.   Moreover, creditors must partake in the interactive process.

It has long been held that if a  creditor has no agreement for acceleration of an entire obligation upon  default, the creditor may not accelerate a debt unless the debtor's default  rises to the status of an anticipatory repudiation. See, e.g., Sheet Metal  Workers Local No. 76 Credit Union v. Hufnagle, 295 N.W.2d 259, 29 U.C.C.  Rep. Serv. 1087 (Minn. 1980).

The Uniform Commercial Code ("UCC") § 1-309 provides  that a term allowing an acceleration of payment or performance or additional  collateral at will, or when the creditor or the creditor's successor in  interest deems himself insecure, and language of similar import, will be  construed to mean that the creditor has the power to do so only if he in good  faith believes that the prospect of payment or performance is impaired.  Section 1 - 309 has been increasingly applied to real estate  transactions. See generally Greenwald v. Columbus Bank & Trust Co.,  228 Ga. App. 527, 492 S.E.2d 248, 34 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d 547 (1997) (good  faith itself does not give rise to an action).

Section 201 of the Bankruptcy Reform  Act can be construed as a model to require creditor's to negotiate in good  faith with debtor's prior to filing any legal action to collect the debt.  It would have amended Section 201 proposes  to allow a bankruptcy judge to reduce a creditor's claim by up to 20% if the  creditor had "unreasonably refused to negotiate a reasonable alternative  repayment schedule. 

Perhaps the most relevant and  significant factor pointing to a strong suggestion if not requirement for  creditor's negotiating with debtors stems from litigation itself.  At a clerk or magistrate's session in small  claims court prior to appearing before a judge, the magistrate will almost  always offer free mediation services provided by the court, and in many cases  go so far as to require the Plaintiff and Defendant to attend a non-binding  mediation session prior to appearing before the District Court Judge.

The gist of the forgoing would seem to indicate that a  debtor is not without recourse even if they have filed for bankruptcy and  obtained a discharge on unsecured debt within the past eight (8) years.  In many case, it may be a good idea to still  speak with a bankruptcy attorney or credit counselor to garner assistance in  proposing a workout plan with one's creditors.

The foregoing article on debt management was drafted by the Law Office of Goldstein and Clegg.


Article submitted Tuesday, August 26, 2008
This article has been viewed 0 times.

  Most Popular

 

Home  |  Submit Your Site  |  Contact  |  Terms of Service

Copyright (c) 2000-2007 Search-o-rama.com, All Rights Reserved
Search-o-rama.com is an IcoLogic, Inc. Website